Ильшат Амирович Мухаметзарипов - Религиозные суды, арбитражи и органы медиации в постсекулярную эпоху

p.
63. Boyd M. Religion-Based Alternative Dispute Resolution: A
Challenge to Multiculturalism // Belonging? Diversity, Recognition
and Shared Citizenship in Canada / Ed. K. Banting, T. J. Courchene,
F. L. Seidle. – Montreal: Institute for research On Public Policy, 2007. –
P. 465–473.
64. Bourdieu P. The Social Structures of the Economy. – Cambridge:
Polity Press, 2005. – 263 p.
65. Bradney A. Law and Faith in a Sceptical Age. – New-YorkOxon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. – 177 p.
66. Broyde M. J. An Unsuccessful Defence of the Beit Din of Rabbi
Emanuel Rackman: The Tears of the Opressed by Aviad Hacohen.
Review Essay // The Edah Journal. – 2004. – № 4:2. – 27 p.
67. Broyde M. J. Faith-Based Private Arbitration as a Model for
Preserving Rights and Values in a Pluralistic Society // Chicago-Kent
Law Review. – 2015. – Vol. 90:1. – P. 111–140.
68. Broyde M. J. Jewish Law Courts in America: Lessons Offered
to Sharia Courts by the Beth Din of America Precedent // New York
Law School Law Review. – 2012/2013. – Vol. 57. – P. 287–311.
150

69. Broyde M. J. Multicultural ADR and Family Law: A Brief
Introduction to the Complexities of Religious Arbitration // Cardozo
Journal of Conflict Resolution. – 2016. – Vol. 17. – P. 793–822.
70. Broyde M. J. Sharia Tribunals, Rabbinical Courts, and Christian Panels. Religious Arbitration in America and the West. – Oxford
University Press, 2017. – 312 p.
71. Broyde M. J., Bedzow I., Pill S. C. The Pillars of Successful
Religious Arbitration: Models for American Islamic Arbitration Based
on the Beth Din of America and Muslim Arbitration Tribunal Experience // Harvard Journal on Racial and Ethnic Justice. – 2014. – Vol.
30. – P. 33–76.
72. Bruins A. Religieuze rechtspraak in Nederland? // Meester in
de taal. – 2013. – № 1. – P. 105–111.
73. Chotalia S. P. Arbitration Using Sharia Law in Canada: A Constitutional and Human Rights Perspective // Constitutional Forum
constitutionnel. – 2006. – Vol. 15, № 2. – P. 63–78.
74. Cranmer F. Regulation Within the Religious Society of Friends
// Ecclesiastical Law Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 7, № 2. – P. 176–194.
75. De Blois M. Religious law versus secular law. The example
of the get refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law // Utrecht Law
Review. – 2010. – Vol. 6, № 2. – P. 93–114.
76. Dupret B. Abjudication in Action. An Ethnomethodology of
Law, Morality and Justice. – London: Routledge, 2011. – 365 p.
77. Durkheim É. De la division du travail social. – Vendôme: Quadrige, 1991. – 416 p.
78. Fournier P., McDougall P. False Jurisdictions? A Revisionist
Take on Customary (Religious) Law in Germany // Texas International
Law Journal. – 2013. – Vol. 48, № 3. – P. 435–463.
79. Fucillo A., Sorvillo F., Decimo L. The courts and the code.
Legal osmosis between religion and law in the cultural framework of
civil law systems // Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale. Rivista
telematica (www.statoechiese.it). – 2017. – № 28. – 13 p.
80. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in
the Late Modern Age. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. – 264 p.
151

81. Greenberg-Kobrin M. Religious Tribunals and Secular Courts:
Navigating Power and Powerlessness // Pepperdine Law Review. –
2014. – Vol. 41, № 5. – P. 997–1012.
82. Griffiths J. What is Legal Pluralism? // The Journal of Legal
Pluralism and Unofficial Law. – 1986. – Vol. 18, № 24. – P. 1–55.
83. Gonzalez F. C. The Legal Self-regulation of Religious Groups:
Tackling the Challenges of Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice.
Working Paper № 21. – Augsburg: RECODE, 2014. – 15 p.
84. Helfand M. A. Religious Arbitration and the New Multiculturalism: Negotiating Conflicting Legal Orders // New York University
Law Review. – 2011. – Vol. 86, № 5. – P. 1231–1305.
85. Helfand M. A. Religion’s Footnote Four: Church Autonomy as
Arbitration // Minnesota Law Review. – 2013. – Vol. 97. – P. 1891–1962.
86. Helfand M. A., Richman B. D. The Challenge of Co-Religionist
Commerce // Duke Law Journal. – February 2015. – Vol. 64, № 5. –
P. 769–822.
87. Kennett W. It’s Arbitration, But Not As We Know It: Reflections
on Family Law Dispute Resolution // International Journal of Law,
Policy and The Family. – 2016. – № 30. – P. 1–31.
88. Lazarev E. A. Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal
Pluralism in Chechnya. Thesis for the degree of Ph.D. – New York:
Columbia University, 2018. – 308 p.
89. Macklin A. Multiculturalism meets privatization: The case of
faith-based arbitration // International Journal of Law in Context. –
2013. – Vol. 9, 3. – P. 343–365.
90. Madera A. Civil and Religious Law concerning Divorce: the
condition of Women and their empowerment // Journal of Law and
Family Studies. – 2010. – Vol. 12. – P. 365–389.
91. Makarov D. Enacting the Sharia Laws in a Dagestani Village
// ISIM Newsletter. – 1998. – № 1/98. – P. 19.
92. McFarlane A. E. Britain’s Religious Courts: Marriage, Divorce
and Civil Law. “Am I bothered?”: The Relevance of Religious Courts
to a Civil Judge. Keynote Address by The Hon. Mr Justice McFarlane. – Cardiff Law School, 2011. – 18 p.
152

93. Merry S. E. Legal Pluralism // Law and Society Review. –
1988. – Vol. 22, № 5. – P. 869–896.
94. Moore S. F. Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous
Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study // Law and Society
Review. – 1973. – Vol. 7, № 4. – P. 719–746.
95. Parsons T. Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. – New York: Free Press, 1977. – 429 p.
96. Perciaccante M. Courts and Canon Law // Cornell Journal of
Law and Public Policy. – 1996. – Vol. 6, № 1. – P. 171–209.
97. Petty A. R. Religion, Conscience, and Belief in the European
Court of Human Rights // The George Washington International Law
Review. – 2016. – Vol. 48. – P. 807–851.
98. Razack S. H. The “Sharia Law Debate” in Ontario: the Modernity/Premodernity Distinction in Legal Efforts to Protect Women from
Culture // Feminist Legal Studies. – 2007. – № 15. – P. 3–32.
99. Religion and the Secular State: National Reports / Ed. Martinez-Torron J., Cole Durham W., Jr. – Provo, Utah: Brigham Young
University, The International Center of Law and Religion Studies,
2010. – 826 p.
100. Rohe M. Islamic Law in Past and Present. – Leiden-Boston:
Brill, 2014. – 676 p.
101. Sadegh I. Religious Courts, Tribunals and Councils in Predominantly Secular States. Their Role in Malta, and England and Wales.
Doctor of Laws Thesis. – University of Malta, June 2013. – 142 p.
102. Selby J. A. Promoting the Everyday: Pro-Sharia Advocacy and
Public Relations in Ontario, Canada’s “Sharia Debate” // Religions. –
2013. – № 4. – P. 423–442.
103. Shachar A. Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from
Religious Arbitration in Family Law // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. –
2008. – № 9.2. – P. 573–607.
104. Shah P. Transnational Hindu law adoptions: recognition and
treatment in Britain // International Journal of Law in Context. – 2009. –
№ 5, 2. – P. 107–130.
153

105. Sisson E. The Future of Sharia Law in American Arbitration // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. – 2015. – Vol. 48. –
P. 891–920.
106. Tamanaha B. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present,
Local to Global // Sydney Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 30. – P. --">